Yesterday I was at a meeting where some of the results of an independent study of our research outcomes was presented.
I was told I couldn’t see all the results, but nobody told me I couldn’t talk about the results that I did see.
The study was carried out by a Dutch company who specialise in this kind of thing. It is to help NUIM focus on those areas where research output is the highest.
So, here it is. The department of biology at NUI Maynooth is now rated as being about 37% above the average for a biological science department among the top 275 universities in the world.
Included in this comparison would be places like Cambridge, Harvard, Oxford, Imperial College, London etc.
What this means is that we would fit easily into a university that is in the top 100, despite NUIM only being in existence as an independent university for about 16 years, despite only receiving moderate amounts of funding for the past decade (in global terms). I think this is a pretty awesome result.This report is an assessment of our research output. Research is done by academics carefully reading huge amounts of literature, identifying research questions that are really important and getting the answers before their competitors get them. This takes time, intelligence and hard work. Very hard work.
What is not being considered in this report is the amount of students that we look after - 15 permanent, full-time academics are teaching about 750 students.
We were reviewed a few months ago by a professor from the UK and a professor from the US. Again, this is an independent view and believe me, these people are independent-minded. Their verdict? They couldn’t believe that we were doing to much work with so few resources. The full report is yet to be published, but this is the feedback we have gotten so far.
At NUI Maynooth there are approximately 275 academic staff and about 5,000 undergrads and 1,500 post-grads.
At Imperial College London, there are approximately 9,000 undergrads and apporximately 4,500 post-grads (a little more than double the student population), however, there are 3,000 academics. Yes 3,000!!!
When Batt O’Keeffe makes his comparisons with the UK, is he taking into consideration how much we work? How much value for money he gets? How much he would really have to spend if he wanted Irish students to have the same resources as the students at Imperial College?
His latest statement about Irish academics working four hours per week is embarassing for him and dangerous for the rest of the country - who wants to go back to a situation where our 3rd level students are being taught by people who have no research record? Do we want the best for our students or do we not? Do we want the best academics to leave because they are not getting support from the Minister who should be supporting them? Does Batt O’Keeffe know the difference? What do we want for our students?
If Batt O’Keeffe damages the 3 level sector any more than it has been damaged, it will be 2030 before we recover - these things take time.
This will mean that Irish academics will be heading to India or China to get jobs there, because believe me, the ministers for education in India and China are not so stupid.